Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 16, 2011
Published
June 18, 2012
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 51 Download : 68

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Peptic ulcer is a common disorder that affects the lives of millions of people every year. The predominant causes of peptic ulcer are infection with the bacterium called Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and the use of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs). Chemical drugs used in the treatment of peptic ulcer produces side effects on long term use. Extensive research has been carried out in the area of treatment of ulcers through medicinal plants. Many medicinal plants have been reported to possess antiulcer activity. Effective plant extracts, screened by cytotoxic, genotoxic, toxicological parameters will lead to establishment as potent candidate for antiulcer drug development.

Keywords

Antiulcer activity herbal plants drug peptic ulcer

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2012 Environment Conservation Journal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rai , N., Kumar, N., Gautam, P., & Rawat, P. (2012). Herbal plants as potent candidate for Anti-ulcer drug development. Environment Conservation Journal, 13(1&2), 187–189. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2012.131235
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Anthony, J.D., Stanley, B.B. 2002. Gastrointestinal disease: an en-doscopic approach, 2nd ed. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc. 431-432.
  2. Bethesda, M.D. 2010. H. pylori and Peptic Ulcers.National Di-gestive Diseases Information Clearinghouse, US FDA, NIH Publication No 10-4225.
  3. Goroll, A.H., Mulley, A.G. 2009. Primary Care Medicine, 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Williams & Wilkins. 537-548.
  4. Hooper, L.V., Gordon, J.I. 2001.Commensal host-bacterial relationships in the gut.Science, 292: 1115-1118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1058709
  5. Kalliomäki, M., Salminen, S., Arvilommi, H., Kero, P., Koskinen, P., Isolauri, E. 2001. Probiotics in primary prevention of atopic disease: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet.357: 1076-1079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04259-8
  6. Lawande,Y.S., Hase, R.S., Jadhav, D.P., Hyalij,T.A. 2011. Recent advances in research of antiulcer drug of natural origin: a review. Int. J. Pharm. Res. & Dev. 3(11): 160-170.
  7. Ley, R.E., Peterson, D.A., Gordon, J.I. 2006.Ecological and evolutionary forces shaping microbial diversity in the human intestine.Cell,124: 837-848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.017
  8. Meyer, T. 2006. The Clinicians Guide to Acid peptic Disorder, 1st ed. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc. 151-180.
  9. Ramakrishnan, K., Salinas, R.C. 2007.Peptic ulcer disease.Jay Siwek, MD: American Family Physician.76(7):1005–1012.
  10. Salminen, S., Gueimonde, M., Isolauri, E. 2005. Probiotics that modify disease risk. J. Nutr., 135: 1294-1298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/135.5.1294
  11. Saurabh, A., Mishra, A.S., Gupta ,S. 2012. A review on medicinal plant which may effective in the treatment of ulcer or which show anti ulcer activities.Int. J. Biopharm. Toxicological Res. 2:266-276.
  12. Solanki, R. 2010. A review on medicinal plants with antiulceractivity.Int. J. pharm. Sci& Bio. 1(2): 67-70.
  13. Sravani, P., Jayasri, P., Samiulla, E.K.P., Nishad, K.P. 2011. Review in natural antiulcer agents. Int. J. Pharm & Ind. Res . 1:67-70.
  14. Wolfsthal, S.D. 2008. Medicine, 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: NMS Medicine. 192-194.
  15. Zoetendal, E.G., Collier, C.T., Koike, S., Mackie, R.I., Gaskins, H.R. 2004. Molecular ecological analysis of the gastrointestinal microbiota: a review. J. Nutr.134(2): 465-472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/134.2.465