Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 25, 2015
Published
December 5, 2015
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 190 Download : 103

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The historical monuments in Iranian architecture are the proof of the rich and practical experience in creating successful architecture and urban planning collections aiming the sense of place. Considering proper distance between components and making appropriate volume combinations so-called joints are few experiences achieved through this context. This is a far-reaching and comprehensive topic that brings valuable lessons in various architecture and urbanism fields so it is necessary to focus more on this subject. Although collected and reliable research in this area does not exist, but a diffused remarks about the role and the effect of considering this issue in some author’s points of view can be found that have been used in this study.Using this concept allegorically in architecture may be practical in various ways so that one can refer to its different types in functional field of articulates such as access, indoor-outdoor, full and blank spaces, and constructional field in material and structural articulates .This research is aimed to study the connected and interstitial spaces especially the forecourt (the open area at the front of the doorway) in order to distinguish the interstitial spaces from other spaces. With the help of this research which the data collection method was through library and field, we can conclude that the forecourt is a sort of dialogue between the visitors and the monument and the monument to the monument itself which try to provide a proper platform to the audiences and visitors and, moreover, the amount of the ornaments and its elements is related to the social, economic and cultural situation of the residents.

Keywords

joint different kinds of joint Iranian architecture forecourt Sigari House at Yazd

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2015 (C) ASEA

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Hashempour, R. ., & Saeed, L. N. . (2015). The Analysis on Articulation (Joint) Space in Matrix of Iranian Architecture Case Study: Forecourt (Doorway Space) of Sigari House at Yazd City. Environment Conservation Journal, 16(SE), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2015.SE1605
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Amid, Hassan 2005. Amid Thesaurus, 31st Ed, Tehran: Amir Kabir Pub
  2. Anvari, Hassan 2002.Sokhan Great Glossary, Sokhan Pub, Tehran.
  3. Chermayev, Search, Christophe, Alexander 1997. Public and private life forums, Tehran: University of Tehran Pub
  4. D.K Ching, Francis 2008. Architecture of form, space, and order, transl. GharagozlooZohreh, 14th Ed, Tehran: University of Tehran Publication and Printing Institute
  5. Dehkhoda, Ali Akbar 1963.Dehkhoda Thesaurus, Tehran: University of Tehran Publication
  6. Dehkhoda, Ali Akbar 2012.Dehkhoda Thesaurus CD-ROM, third exhibition for scientific- research achievements of Tehran University, Tehran
  7. DoostiMotlagh, Peyvand, Analysis on history of entrance2009.two quarterlies of utopian architecture and urbanism, vol. 2, spring & summer, Tehran
  8. Ebba, Koch 1991. Mughal architecture: an outline of its history and development (1526- 1858), Munich
  9. Falamaki, Mohammad Mansur 2006. Formation of architecture in Iranian and west experiences, 2nd Ed, Faza Pub
  10. Frascari, Marco 1996. The Tell–the Tale Detail, In Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture: an anthology of architectural theory (1955-1965), p.p: Kate Nesbitt, Princeton Architectural Press, New York
  11. Handwritings of Dr. Jeddi and Dr. Oliya and Eng, HadiRazavi, Yazd
  12. Jafari, Rashid, Saadati, Poorandokht, Mahdavipoor, Hossein, Position of forecourt in Iranian local housing architecture 2013. Quarterly of rural housing and environment, vol. 142, summer, Tehran
  13. Lung, John 2004. Creation of architectural theory, transl. EinifarAlireza, 2nd Ed, Tehran University Pub
  14. Moein, Mohammad 1981. Persian glossary, 1st vol., 4th Ed, Tehran: Amir Kabir Pub
  15. Mofid, Hassan 1995. Gnostic manifestations in architectural geometry (bricklayer’s bond), ICHTO Organization Pub, Tehran
  16. Motamedi, Mohsen 2002. Tehran historic geography, Tehran
  17. Noroozi, Reza, Analysis on concept of articulate (joint) in architectural matrix organization, 2012.autumn& winter, Yazd University
  18. Pirnia, Mohammad Karim 2006. Geometry in architecture, author: Bozorgmehri, Zohreh, Iranian Cultural Heritage, Tourism, and Handicrafts Organization (ICHTHO) Pub, Tehran
  19. Pirnia, Mohammad Karim 2010. Iranian architecture, Soroush-E-Danesh Pub, Tehran, 2nd Ed
  20. Rahimzadeh, Mohammad Reza 2004. Being, thinking, and implementation: Pondering in origin of architecture, Fine Arts Campus, Tehran University
  21. RamezanJamaat, Mina, Neyestani, Javad, Effects of tradition and modernity in entrance spaces of Tehran houses in Qajar era, 2010 Journal of fine arts, vol. 44, winter, Tehran
  22. Ravaghi, Ali 2002. Under Persian glossaries, Tehran: Hermes Pub
  23. Rezakhani, Gila, A prologue to concept of articulation in architecture based on Heidegger’s method in etymology of term,2014.two quarterlies of Iranian architecture, vol. 5, spring & summer, Tehran
  24. Saadvandi, Mehdi, Modaber, Masoud, Assessment of forecourt space (doorway), 2013.winter, Mashhad
  25. Sayah, Ahmad 1996. Al-Monjed Al-Abjadi Arabic-to-Persian academic glossary, Tehran: Islam Pub
  26. Sultanzadeh, Hossein 1993. Entrance spaces in Iranian traditional architecture, Tehran Municipality, Tehran
  27. Sultanzadeh, Hossein 1993. Entrance spaces in Iranian traditional architecture, Cultural researches office, 3rd Ed, Tehran
  28. The American Heritage Dictionary, 4th Edition, CD
  29. http://www.archi-land.mihanblog.com/post/16, (05/01/2015, 05:24 (PM))
  30. http://www.badroodmemari.blogfa.com/category/195, (25/01/2015, 10:45 (AM))