Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 10, 2017
Published
December 21, 2017
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 272 Download : 320

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Leguminous crops suffer severely in soils poor in phosphorus. The experiment was conducted in college form college of agriculture, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad to explore the effect of Bio and Nano P fertilizer (soil application of bio and nano P @65 kg ha-1and foliar application of bio Phosphorus @2 and 4ml l-1 and nano Phosphorus @1 and 2ml l-1respectively) in terms of yield and yield attributes and quality of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L). DAP was applied as basal dose,while bio and nano phosphorus was applied according to the treatments.Concerning the main effects, bio phosphorus proved superior or equivalent to nano phosphorus gave the greatest values for yield and yield parameters.

Keywords

Arachis hypogaea bio phosphorus nano phosphorus yield yield parameters

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2017 (C) ASEA

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Kumari, M. ., Rao, P. C. ., Padmaja, G. ., Ramulu, V. ., Saritha , J. D. ., & Ramakrishna , K. . (2017). Effect of bio and nano phosphorus on yield, yield attributes and oil content of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea. l). Environment Conservation Journal, 18(3), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2017.18303
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Badsra, S.R and Chaudhary, L. 2001. Association of yield and its components in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Agriculture Science Digest., 21(2): 83-86.
  2. Brady, N.C. 1983. The nature and properties of soils. Macmillan Publication Co., New York and Collier Macmillan Publisher, London.
  3. DeRosa, M.R., Monreal, C., Schnitzer, M., Walsh, R. and Sultan, Y. 2010. Nanotechnology in fertilizers. National Nanotechnology journal. 5: 91-96.
  4. Devi, T.S., Singh, T.B and Singh, W.M. 2012. Response of soybean to source and levels of phosphorus. Journal of Agricultural Science., 4: 6-10.
  5. Dhoke, S.K, Mahajan, P., Kamble, R and Khanna, A. 2012. Effect of nanoparticles suspension on the growth of mung (Vigna radiata) seedlings by foliar spray method. Nanotechnology., 3: 1-5.
  6. Dwivedi, A.K. and Bapat, P.N. 1988. Sulphur phosphorus interactions on the synthesis of nitrogenous fractions and oil in soybean. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science., 46: 245-248.
  7. Gitari, J.N, Mureithi, J.G. 2003. Effect of phosphorus fertilization on legume nodule formation and biomass production in MountKenya Region. East African Agriculture Journal., 69: 183-187.
  8. Ijgude, M.B and Kadam, J.R. 2008. Effect of phosphorus and sulphur on yield and quality of soybean. Asian Journal of Soil Science., 3: 142-143.
  9. Ogola A.H, Odhiambo, G.D, Okalebo, J.R andMuyekho, F.N. 2012. Influence of phosphorus on selected disodium growth andnodulation parameters. ARPN Journal of Agricultural Biological Science., 7: 294-301.
  10. Selvakumar G, Lenin M, Thamizhiniyan P, Ravimycin, T. 2009. Response of biofertilizers on the growth and yield of black gram (Vigna mungo L.).Recent Research in Science andTechnology., 1: 169-175.
  11. Selvakumar, G., Reetha, S., Thamizhiniyan, P. 2012. Response ofbiofertilizers on growth, yield attributes and associated proteinprofiling changes of blackgram (Vigna mungo L.).World Applied ScienceJournal., 16: 1368-1374.
  12. Singh, V.K and Singh, V. 1988. Response of mustard to phosphorus and sulphur fertilization. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science., 58(10): 754-756.
  13. Zheng, L.F., Hong, S., Lu and Liu, C. 2005. Effect of nano-TiO2 on strength of naturally aged seeds and growth of spinach. Biological Trace Elements Research., 104: 83-91.