Main Article Content

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted at Horticultural Research Station, Kahikuchi, Guwahati, to study the effect of different sizes of plants on vegetative growth and flower production of Phaius tankervilleae. Five different plants with varying sizes and numbers of pseudo bulb were adopted as treatments which were replicated 4 times. The flowers bloom from April and the experiment shows T3 produces the maximum number of spikes (2.38) per plant and earliest spike initiation (250.77) days while T5 produces the least number of spikes (0.5) plants and  took longest days for spike initiation with (255.13) days. Meanwhile, T1 produce more new pseudo bulbs (4.0) and the least number was seen in T5 with (2.14). But T5 plants produced the biggest new pseudo bulbs (2.85cm diameter). Irrespective of the numbers of the pseudo bulb, plants with bigger pseudo bulb produced a bigger plant, long spike, more spike, bigger and more number of flowers which are a superior trait for a good quality cut flower. Beyond the production of flowers, this experiment further promotes the multiplication of pseudo bulbs, which are necessary for increasing the population of the plants for restoring and conserving the plant population without further exploitation.

Keywords

Endangered Orchid Ornamental plant Propagation Pseudo bulb

Article Details

How to Cite
Sushma Devi, N., Hatibarua, . P., Borah, S. K., & Mazumdar, N. . (2022). Effect of plant size on growth and flower production of Phaius tankervilleae (Banks ex L’Hérit.) Blume - an endangered orchid of North-Eastern India. Environment Conservation Journal, 23(1&2), 278–282. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.0211001-2218

References

  1. Chang, C., & Jian, W. T. (2010). The growth evaluation of Phaius tankervilleae cultivation in botanical garden. Seed Nursery, 12, 13-22.
  2. Deb, C. R., & Jakha, H. Y. (2019). Orchid diversity in three districts [Kiphire, Tuensang and Zunheboto] of Nagaland, India. Pleione 13(2), 203 – 215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26679/Pleione.13.2.2019.203-215
  3. Dey, S., Lahkar, B. P., Das, J. P., Nath, N. K., & Brahma, N. (2007). Orchid diversity in Manas National Park, Assam. Journal of the Orchid Society of India, 21(1-2), 65-68.
  4. Kanwal, K. S. (2014). Conservation of Phaius tankervilleae a valuable orchid of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Indian Forester, 140(12), 1263-1264.
  5. Lopez, R. G., & Runkle, E. S. (2006). Temperature and photoperiod regulate flowering of potted Miltoniopsis orchids. Horticulture Science, 41, 593–597. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.41.3.593
  6. Medhi, R. P., & Chakrabarti, S. (2009). Traditional Knowledge of NE People on conservation of wild orchids. Indian journal of Traditional Knowledge, 8(1), 11-16.
  7. Sadananda, K., Thongam, B., & Konsam, B. (2019). Orchid species of Manipur and its commercial aspect. International Journal of Pharmacy & Life Sciences, 10(7), 6302-6314.
  8. Tsai, Y. C., & Chang, C. (2009). The breeding history and parents analysis of Phaius tankervilleae. Seed Nursery (Taiwan), 11, 37-50.
  9. Zimmerman, J. K. (1990). Role of pseudo bulbs in growth and flowering of Catasetum viridiflavum (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany, 77(4), 533–542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1990.tb13585.x