Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 24, 2021
Accepted
November 22, 2021
Published
December 19, 2021
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 238 Download : 142

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The knowledge of different sulphur (S) forms and their relationship with soil properties is of much relevance in assessing the short- and long-term availability of the nutrients to crops and in formulating sound fertilizer recommendations. For this purpose one hundred and one representative soil samples were collected from the study area and analyzed for various physicochemical properties and forms of sulphur (water soluble, exchangeable, available, organic, non-sulphate and total S) using standard methods. The different forms of sulphur viz., water soluble, exchangeable, available, organic, non-sulphate and total sulphur ranged from 1.1 to 7.0, 1.9 to 10.9, 3.1 to 21.1, 75.9 to 316.1, 8.0 to 41.5 and 75.5 to 372.5 mg kg-1, respectively in soils of Outer Himalayas under different land uses. The content of different forms of sulphur present in these soils were in the order of total sulphur, organic sulphur, non-sulphate sulphur, available sulphur, exchangeable sulphur and water soluble sulphur. All the forms of S correlated positively and significantly with organic carbon and clay content of soils. A negative and significant relationship was also observed between all forms of sulphur and sand content of soils. In the present study, it was also found that all forms of S present in soils were significantly and positively correlated with each other. The knowledge regarding different forms of S in soils and their availability controlled by different soil properties will be helpful for its management to optimize crop yields in the Outer Himalayas of Himachal Pradesh.

Keywords

Exchangeable Sulphur nematodes Organic Sulphur Total Sulphur Water soluble sulphur

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Environment Conservation Journal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Suri, D. ., Sharma , V. K. ., Kumar, P. . ., Upadhayay, R. G., Nazir, G. . ., & K., A. (2021). Sulphur Dynamics under different land uses of Outer Himalayan region of Himachal Pradesh. Environment Conservation Journal, 22(3), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2021.22331
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Azmi, N. Y. Seema, & Manish, K., (2018). New technique for sequential fractionation of soil sulphur. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Appled Sciences, 7, 3397-3405.
  2. Bandyopadhyay, P. K., & Chattopadhyay, G. N. (2001). Different forms of sulphur in relation to soil properties in some Alfisols and Inceptisols of Birbhum district of West Bengal.
  3. Anjali, B., & Das, K. N. (2012). Forms of sulphur and their relationship with soil properties in some soils of North Bank Plain zone of Assam. Agropedology, 22(1), 43-49.
  4. Bhogal, N. S., Choudhary, K. C., & Sakal, R. (1996). Distribution of different forms of sulphur in Calciorthents of North Bihar. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 44(1), 65-69.
  5. Chesnin, L., & Yien, C. H. (1951). Turbidimetric determination of available sulfates. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 15(C), 149-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1951.036159950015000C0032x
  6. Dhamak, A. L., Meshram, N. A., & Waikar, S. L. (2014). Comparative studies on dynamics soil properties and forms of sulphur in oilseed growing soils of Ambajogai Tahsil of Beed district. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, 7(12), 98-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9790/2380-0712298102
  7. Dolui, A. K., & Pradhan, S. (2007). Sulphur mineralization and carbon, nitrogen, and sulphur relationships in some Alfisols of India. Communications in soil science and plant analysis, 38(1-2), 133-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620601094031
  8. Khalid, R., Khan, K. S., Akram, Z., Qureshi, R., & Gulfraz, M. (2011). Relationship of plant available sulphur with soil characteristics, rainfall and yield levels of oilseed crops in Pothwar Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 43(6), 2929-2935.
  9. Majumdar, S., & Patil, P. L. (2017). Carbon dynamics under different land use systems of a micro-watershed in Northern Transition Zone of Karnataka. ORYZA-An International Journal on Rice, 54(4), 414-419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-5266.2017.00056.X
  10. Patra, P., Mondal, S., & Ghosh, G. K. (2012). Distribution of sulphur fractions in surface and sub-surface soils of red and lateritic soils of West Bengal. Indian Agriculturist, 56(1/2), 1-7.
  11. Solomon, D., Lehmann, J., Tekalign, M., Fritzsche, F., & Zech, W. (2001). Sulfur fractions in particle-size separates of the sub-humid Ethiopian highlands as influenced by land use changes. Geoderma, 102(1-2), 41-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(00)00103-8
  12. Sutaria, G. S., Vora, V. D., Talpada, M. M., Hirpara, D. S., Vekaria, P. D., & Akbari, K. N. (2016). Studies on sulphur fractions in soils of Rajkot district, Gujarat. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, 6(1), 61-68.
  13. Swarnkar, K. C., & Verma, M. M. (1978). Distribution of forms of sulphur in soil profiles of Bundel Khand region [India]. Indian Journal of Agricultural Chemistry.
  14. Zho Hua-Yun, X. I. A. O., Nan, L. I., & Cong-Qiang, L. I. U. (2015). Source identification of sulfur in uncultivated surface soils from four Chinese provinces. Pedosphere, 25(1), 140-149.u, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(14)60084-9
  15. Zhou, W., He, P., Li, S., & Lin, B. (2005). Mineralization of organic sulfur in paddy soils under flooded conditions and its availability to plants. Geoderma, 125(1-2), 85-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.07.005