Main Article Content

Abstract

The tiger (Panthera tigris) is highly endangered through out its range and one of the impediments to effective tiger conservation is the lack of simple and cost effective methods for monitoring of wild tiger populations. With an aim to find a rapid, cost effective, and statistically robust methodology to take quick management decisions, observations of tiger and co-predator sign in administrative subunits (beats) of the Similipal Tiger Reserve, located between 200 28’ and 220 08’ North latitude, and 860 04’ and 860 37’ East longitude in India, were subjected to an occupancy estimation and modeling analysis. Several environmental factors were identified as covariates with explanatory power for the pattern of observations of tiger sign. Most important of these were the proportion of the area of the beat that is classified as disturbed habitat, the distance between the beat and the nearest inhabited place, and the total number of prey observed in the beat in a separate set of surveys for ungulates and other tiger prey species. The results of this analysis have clear management implications for the reserve, with beats classifiable into four categories, each with its own target strategy for increasing tiger abundance. These categories are: highest concern, reduce disturbance, increase prey protection, and maintain current protection. This study suggests that occupancy estimation and modeling from surveys of large mammalian predator sign is a simple cost-effective statistically robust methodology that can be performed by the management staff of a reserve and can be used to engage members of the local population in conservation.

Keywords

conservation management occupancy analysis Panthera tigris Tiger conservation

Article Details

How to Cite
Swain, D. ., & Morris, P. J. . (2014). Occupancy estimation and modeling in monitoring tigers with implications for conservation and management. Environment Conservation Journal, 15(1&2), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2014.151204

References

  1. Burnham, K.P., and Anderson, D.R. 2002. ‘Model selection and multimodel inference’ [2nd ed.]. (Springer-Verlag: New York).
  2. Choudhury, S.R. 1999. ‘Khairi: The beloved tigress’. (Natraj Publishers: Dehradun, India).
  3. Dinerstein, E., Loucks, C., Wikramanayake, E., Ginsberg, J., Sanderson, E., Seidensticker, J., Forrest, J., Bryja, G., Heydlauff, A., Klenzendorf, S., Leimgruber, P., Mills, J., O’Brien, G.T., Shrestha, M., Simons, R., and Songer, M. 2007. The fate of wild tigers. BioScience, 57, 508-14.
  4. Evans, K., and Guariguata, M.R. 2008. ‘Participatory monitoring in tropical forest management: A review of tools, concepts and lessons learned’. (Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia).
  5. Gittleman, J.L. 1985. Carnivore body size: Ecological and taxonomic correlates. Oecologia 67, 540-554.
  6. Graham, K., Beckermaman, A.P., and Thirgood, S. 2005. Human-predator-prey conflicts: Ecological correlates, prey losses and pattern of management. Biological Conservation 122, 159-171.
  7. Hines, J.E. 2006. ‘PRESENCE2- Software to estimate patch occupancy and related parameters’. USGS-PWRC. [Software] http://www.mbrpwrc.usgs.gov/software/presence.html.
  8. Jhala, Y., Qureshi, Q., and Gopal, R. 2005. Field guide: Monitoring tigers, co-predators, prey and their habitats. (Project Tiger, Union Ministry of Environment and Forests: New Delhi, India).
  9. Johnsingh, A.T., and Negi, A.S. 2003. Status of tiger and leopard in Rajaji-Corbett Conservation Unit, northern India. Biological Conservation 111, 385-393.
  10. Karanth, K.U., Nichols, J.D. & Sen, P.K., and Rishi, V. 2002. Monitoring tigers and prey: conservation needs and managerial constraints. In ‘Monitoring tigers and their prey: A manual for researchers, managers and conservationists in tropical Asia’. (Eds. Karanth, K.U., and Nichols J.D.) pp. 1-8. (Centre for Wildlife Studies: Bangalore, India).
  11. Karanth, K.U., and Stith, B.M. 1999. Prey depletion as a critical determinant of tiger population viability. In ‘Riding the Tiger: Tiger conservation in human-dominated landscapes’. (Eds. Seidensticker, J.S., Christie, S., and Jackson, P.) pp. 100-113. (Cambridge University Press: London).
  12. Karanth, K.U., Nichols, J.D., Seidensticker, J., Dinerstein, E., Smith, J.L.D., McDougal, C., Johnsingh, A.J.T., Chundawat, R.S., and Thapar, V. 2003. Science deficiency in conservation practice: The monitoring of tiger populations in India. Animal Conservation 6,141-146.
  13. Kitchener, A.C. 1999. Tiger distribution, phenotypic variation and conservation issues. In ‘Riding the Tiger: Tiger conservation in human-dominated landscapes’ (Eds. Seidensticker, J.S., Christie, S., and Jackson, P.) pp. 19-39. (Cambridge University Press: London).
  14. Mackenzie, D.I., Nichols, J.D., Lachman, G.B., Droege, S., Royale, J.A., and Langtimm C.A. 2002. Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probability is less than one. Ecology 83,2248-2255.
  15. MacKenzie, D.I., Nichols, J.D., Royle, J.A., Pollock, K.H., Bailey, L.L., and Hines, J.E. 2006. ‘Occupancy estimation and modeling: Inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence’. (Academic Press: Burlington, MA).
  16. Maza’k, V.J. 1996. ‘Der tiger’(Reprint of 1983 edn.). (Magdeburg: Westarp Wissenschaften).
  17. Miquelle, D.G., Smirnov, E.N., Merrill, T.W., Myslenkof, A.E., Quigley, H.B., Hornocker, M.C., and Schleyer, B. 1999. Heirarchical Spatial Analysis of Amur tiger relationships to habitat and prey. In ‘Riding the Tiger: Tiger conservation in human-dominated landscapes’ (Eds. Seidensticker, J.S., Christie, S., and Jackson, P.) pp. 71-99. (Cambridge University Press: London).
  18. Nichols, J.D. 1991. Extensive monitoring programs viewed as long-term population studies: The case of North American waterfowl. Ibis 133(supplement 1), 89-98.
  19. Nichols, J.D., and Karanth, K.U. 2002. Population monitoring: A conceptual framework. In ‘Monitoring tigers and their prey: A manual for researchers, managers and conservationists in tropical Asia’. (Eds. Karanth, K.U., and Nichols J.D.) pp. 23-28. (Centre for Wildlife Studies: Bangalore, India).
  20. Nowell, K., and Jackson, P. 1996. ‘Wild cats: Status survey and conservation action plan’. (IUCN: Gland, Switzerland).
  21. Ramakrishnan, U., Coss, R.G., and Pelkey, N.W. 1999. Tiger decline caused by the reduction of large ungulate prey: Evidence from a study of leopard diets in southern India. Biological Conservation 89,113-120.
  22. Ranganathan, J., Chan, K.M.A., Karanth, K.U., and Smith, J.L.D. 2008. Where can tigers persist in future? A landscape-scale, density-based population model for the Indian subcontinent. Biological Conservation 141, 67-77.
  23. Seidensticker, J., Christie, S., and Jackson, P. (eds) 1999. ‘Riding the Tiger: Tiger conservation in human-dominated landscapes’. (Cambridge University Press: London).
  24. Singh, L.A.K. 1999. ‘Tracking tigers: Guidelines for estimating wild tiger populations using the pugmark technique’. (WWF Tiger Conservation Program: New Delhi, India).
  25. Sunquist, M., Karanth, K.U., and Sunquist, F. 1999. Ecology, behavior and resilience of the tiger and its conservation needs. In ‘Riding the Tiger: Tiger conservation in human-dominated landscapes’ (Eds. Seidensticker, J.S., Christie, S., and Jackson, P.) pp. 5-18. (Cambridge University Press: London).
  26. Swain, D. 2005. Similipal biosphere reserve. In ‘Proceedings of Indo-US workshop on conservation of biodiversity in Similipal biosphere reserve (14-15 November, 2005)’. pp. 38-41. (North Orissa University: Baripada, India).
  27. Wang, S.W., and Macdonald, D.W. 2006. Livestock predation by carnivores in Jigme Singye Wangchuck National Park, Bhutan. Biological Conservation 129, 558-565.
  28. Wilson, D.E., and Reeder D.M. (eds) 2005. ‘Mammal Species of the World. A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference’ (3rd ed). Johns Hopkins University Press. Available at http://www.press.jhu.edu.