Main Article Content


Trees act as a sink for CO2 by fixing carbon during photosynthesis and storing surplus carbon as biomass which alter through time as trees grow, die and decay. There is uncertainty about the extent of carbon stored in forests by trees. 28 species belonging to 20 families were studied to demonstrate relationship among carbon sequestration which was half the tree biomass. Total carbon sequestration was 448.044 tonnes dominated byTectona grandis L.F., Butea monosperma (Lam) Taub and Diospyrosmelanoxylon Roxb. The deviation in carbon sequestration was observed due to girth, height, biomass, native place and economic importance of species. Statistically a positive correlation of 0.966 was found between the total number of trees and total carbon sequestration.


Carbon emission carbon sink girth height total above ground biomass tropical dry deciduous forest

Article Details

How to Cite
Pilania , P. ., Gujar, R., & Panchal, N. . (2014). Carbon sequestration by different tree species in tropical dry deciduous forest of Panchmahal District (Gujarat) in India. Environment Conservation Journal, 15(3), 101–107.


  1. Baishya, R., S.K. Barik and K. Upadhaya. 2009. Distribution pattern of aboveground biomass in natural and plantation forests of humid tropics in northeast India. Tropical Ecology, 50(2): 295-304.
  2. Bala, G., Caldeira, K., Wickett, M., Phillips, T.J., Lobel’l, D.B., Delire, C. and Mirin, A. 2007. Combined climate and carbon-cycle effects of largescale deforestation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 104 6550–6555.
  3. Bridsey, R.A. 1992. Carbon storage and accumulation in United States Forests Ecosystems.North-eastern Forest Experiment Station, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service.
  4. Brown, I.F., L.A. Martinelli, W.W. Thomas, M.Z. Moreira, C.A.C. Ferreira & R.A. Victoria. 1995. Uncertainty in the biomass of Amazonian forests - an example from Rondonia ,Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management, 75:175-189.
  5. Brown, S. 1996. Tropical forests and the global carbon cycle: estimating state and change in biomass density. In: M. Apps & D. Price (eds.) Forest Ecosystems, Forest Management and the Global Carbon Cycle.NATO ASI Series, Springer-Verlag. pp. 135-144.
  6. Brown, S., and A. Lugo. 1992. Aboveground biomass estimates for tropical moist forests of the Brazilian Amazon. Interciencia, 17:8-18.
  7. Brown, S., A.J.R. Gillespie and A.E. Lugo. 1991. Biomass of tropical forests of South and Southeast Asia. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research,21:111-117.
  8. Clark, A., A.R. Saucer, W.H. Mcnab, 1986. Total –Tree weight, stem weight, and volume tables for hardwood species in the Southeast. Research Division, Georgia Forestry Commission.
  9. Clark, D.B. and D.A. Clark. 1996. Abundance, growth and mortality of very large trees in neotropical low land rain forest. Forest Ecology and Management,80:235-244.
  10. Dewald, S., S. Josiah, B. Erdkamp. 2005. Heating with wood: Producing, harvesting and processing firewood.University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
  11. Dixon, R.K., S. Brown, R. A. Houghton, A. M. Solomon, M.C Trexler and J.Wisniewski. 1994. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems.Science,263,185-190.
  12. Francesco F., et al. 2011. Sustainable management techniques for trees in the urban areas.Journal of Biodiversity and Ecological Sciences JBES, 1 (1):1-20.
  13. Haripriya, G.S. 2003.Carbon Budget of the Indian Forest Ecosystem. Climate Change, 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 56:291-391.
  14. Houghton, RA. 1985. Net flux of carbon dioxide from tropical forest in 1980. Nature, 316.
  15. Houghton, R.A; 1990 The Future Role of Tropical Forest in Affecting the Carbon Dioxide Concentration of Atmosphere, Ambio, 19, 204-209.
  16. Jana, B.K., S. Biswas, M. Majumder, P.K. Roy, & A. Majumder. 2009. Carbon sequestration rate and aboveground biomass carbon potential of four young species .Journal of Tropical ecology and Natural Environmenti, 1(2):015-024.
  17. Lal, M., R. Singh. 2000. Carbon sequestration potential of Indian Forests. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 60:315-327.
  18. Misra, R. 1968.Ecology Workbook, Oxford & IBH Publishing Co, Calcutta, India.
  19. NCAER: 1985, Domestic Fuel Survey with Special Reference to Kerosene, National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER), New Delhi
  20. Sejdo, R. A. 1989. Forest to offset the greenhouse effect. J Forestry, 87:12-15.
  21. Terakunpisut, J., N. Gajaseni& N. Ruankawe . 2007. Carbon sequestration potential in aboveground biomass of thong phaphun national forest, Thailand. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research,5:93-102.
  22. Warran, A., A. Patwardhan, 2008. Carbon sequestration potential of trees in and around Pune City, Retrieved from
  23. Watson, R.T. 2000. Land use, land-use change, and forestry: A special report of the IPCC (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) p 377.
  24. Yadav, P.S., S.L. Devi. 2006. In Floristic diversity assessment and vegetation analysis of tropical semi evergreen forest of Manipur, north east India. Tropical Ecology, 47(1):89-95.