Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is a reflection on two common approaches Process Approach and Content Approach to P4C and The answer to this question that; Is it possible to Integrated approach the Philosophy for Children achieved? Accordingly, First, the approach of content and process  Evaluated and Has been Reflection on the strengths and shortcomings and after Integrated approach is proposed as an alternative to existing approaches, and has been describe how this approach. one of the achievements This article is; Emphasis will philosophises Cause To form Process Approach Like What Lippman did Another Content Approach Trying to Philosophical ideas To express The story stated as it could be found in the Gaarder's work, “Sophie's world”; Consequently, should be the philosophy for children Combining both content-approach and Process Approach Knew that The content of the story with philosophical themes Their designs The community of inquiry will find.

Keywords

Philosophy for Children Content Approach process Approach

Article Details

How to Cite
Jahani, R. ., & Akbari, A. . (2015). Philosophy for Children (P4C): Integrated Approach to Teaching Thinking (Process Approach and Content Approach). Environment Conservation Journal, 16(SE), 487–493. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2015.SE1657

References

  1. Islami, Hassan 2006. West philosophy and Islamic philosophy in educational texts, the Ayene Pajhoohesh journal , (92): 21-2.
  2. Smith, Philip; Holfish, Gordon 1993. Logical thinking, methods of education, translated by Ali Shariatmadari, Tehran.
  3. Amy, Zahra, F Gharamaleki, A. 2006. Compare styles and Bernie Lippman fired in philosophy for children, new religious ideas, (2): 23-7.
  4. Bagheri, Khosrow, Yari Dehnavi, Murad 2010. Survey of the history of philosophy in explaining and teaching philosophy to children with emphasis on Hegel's view, of culture, (69): 38-11.
  5. Bontempo, Charles Jay. 2007. The Owl of Minerva: philosophy, according to philosophers, translator M. Upper Tehran: Phoenix.
  6. SafayiMoqhadam, M; Marashi, SM; PakSersht, MJ; Bagheri, Khosrow, thanks, H. 2007. The effect of teaching philosophy to children on developing reasoning skills of public school students grade boy Ahwaz Chamran martyr University Journal of Psychology, 13 (2): 54-31.
  7. Farzanfar, J.; Ghaedi, John; NqhibZadeh, Mirabdolhosein; Mahmudniya, AR 2011. chosen literary program. The syllabus for "Philosophy for Children", Journal of Children's Literature Studies, 1 (2): 156-125.
  8. Khosrow Nejhad, M. 2006. About components of children's stories and teaching philosophy to children, talk with the doctor Khosronejad Saeed Naji. Book of the month for children and adolescents. 8 (12): 30-26.
  9. Frmhinii Frahany, M, Mirza, Mohamadi-Hasan; Kharstany, Ismail 2009. Explain the purposes of teaching philosophy to children in different countries, Philosophy, 4 (4): 70-45.
  10. Low, Philip 2001. Thinking Stories 1, Philosophical Inquiry for children, translation Ahsanh Bagheri, Tehran, Amir.
  11. Garder, Yustavin 2012. Sophie's World, a story about the history of philosophy. Cyrus translate Safavi. Tehran: Cultural Research.
  12. Gotek, Gerald L. 2006. Schools of philosophical and educational ideas. Translation MJ Pakseresht. Tehran: a.
  13. Nagy, S. 2009. Philosophical exploration for children, talk with the pioneers, the first volume, Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.
  14. Nagy, S. 2011. Philosophical Inquiry for children, a dialogue with the leaders, Volume II, Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.
  15. Guidance, M.. 2010. The effect of Philosophy for Children curriculum for the research community on improving interpersonal relationships among the students of Tehran from the perspective of teachers, new ideas in the Journal of Education, 4 (3): 149-133.
  16. Biesa, G. 2011. Philosophy, Exposure, and Children: How to Resist the Instrumentalisation of Philosophy in Education, Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45 (2), 305-319.
  17. Gregory, M. 2008. Philosophy for Children as a Process and a Content Approach to Philosophy Education: A Response to Judith Suissa, proceedings of Annual Conference of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain, New College, Oxford University. Available at: http://www.philosophy-of-education.org.
  18. Lipman, M. 1991. Thinking in Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Lyle, S. & Thomas-Williams, J. 2012. Dialogic practice in primary schools: how primary head teachers plan to embed philosophy for children into the whole school, Educational Studies, 38 (1), 1-12.
  20. Ndofirepi, A.P. 2011. Philosophy for Children: the quest for an African perspective, South African Journal of Education, 31 (2), 246-256.