Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 22, 2017
Published
June 20, 2018
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 237 Download : 110

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Plankton are important biotic component of aquatic habitat. They do determine the trophic status and quality of water. The phytoplankton is the base of most of the lake food web. It forms a bulk of food for zooplankton, fishes and other aquatic organisms. The biodiversity of phytoplankton and zooplankton in any water body shows a correlation with reference to their occurrences and physic-chemical factors. The present paper is an attempt to enumerate the phytoplanktonic diversity of the Ramala Lake, Chandrapur, and Maharashtra. Data is collected during the different seasons from November 2006 to October 2007. The plankton community showed the seasonal fluctuations. The phytoplankton population of Ramala Lake was found to be composed of four major groups namely Chlorophyceae (48.40%), Bacillariophyceae (24.81%), Myxophyceae (22.44%) and Euglenophyceae (4.32%). The class Chlorophyceae represented by 11 species stood first quantitatively and qualitatively, Bailloriophyceae by 7 species, Myxophyceae by 5 and Euglenophyceae by only 2 species.

Keywords

Phytoplankton Zooplankton diversity productivity biological indicator

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2018 (C) ASEA

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
R.Kulkarni, R. ., & Zade, S. (2018). Qualitative and quantitative analysis of phytoplankton in Ramala Lake. Environment Conservation Journal, 19(1&2), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2018.191209
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. APHA, American Public Health Association 1985. Standard method for the examination of water and waste water. 14th Ed. APHA-AWWA-WPCF. Washington, D.C. : 1193.
  2. Adoni, A.D. 1985. Workbook on Limnology; Indian MAB Committee, Depts. of Environment, Govt. of India.
  3. Das, S.M. and V.K. Shrivastava 1959. Studies on freshwater plankton III. Qualitative. Composition and Seasonal fluctuation in plankton components, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India, 29: 174-189.
  4. Krishnan Hari, Thomas K. Sabu, Sunil George, Paul Murugan, R. Sathish mundayoor and Das, M.r. 1999. A study on the distribution and ecology of phytoplankton in the Kuttanad wetland ecosystem, Kerala. Poll Res. 18(3):261-269.
  5. Hutchinson, G.B. 1957. A treatise on limnology vol. II John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1015.
  6. Kalyani, Y. and M.A. Singara Charya 1999. Phytoplankton dynamics in Bhadrakali lake,Warangal,(A.P.) In : Fresh water ecosystem of India. (Ed. K. Vijaykumar) Daya publishing house Delhi.:209-225.
  7. Meshram, C.B. and R.R. Dhande 2000. Algal diversity with respect to pollution status of Wadali Lake, Amravati, (M.S.) India. J. Aqua. Biol. 15 (1&2): 1-5.
  8. Pailwan, I.F. 2005. Limnology and fisheries potential of perennial tanks of Kolhapur district, Kolhapur. Ph.D. Thesis, Shivaji University, Kolhapur.
  9. Palmer, C.M. 1969. A composite rating of algae tolerating organic pollution. J. Phycol., 5:78-82.
  10. Paramasivam, M. and Sreenivasan, A. 1981. Changes in algal flora due to pollution in Cauvery river. Ind. J. Environ. Hlth, 23: 222-238.
  11. Prescott, G.W. 1969. The algae A : Review. Thomas Nelson and sons. Ltd. London: 289-292.
  12. Sehgal, K.L. 1983. Planktonic copepods of fresh water, ecosystems INTERPRINT, New Delhi.
  13. Shashikant 1979. Diatoms as indicators of water quality.Proc. Sym.Biol:303-08.
  14. Venkateswarlu, V. 1969. Ecology of Algae in the River Moosi, Hyderabad with special reference to water pollution I. Physico-chemical complexes. Hydrobiologia 33:117-143
  15. Wetzel, R.G. 1975. Limnology. B.Saunders Company, Philadelphia L:743.