Main Article Content

Abstract

The present study was carried out to find out the nutritional status  of three tribal populations- Santhal,  Ho and Bhumij,  inhabiting  in  different   environmental   conditions  i.e.  industrialized   and  dense  forested   regions  of Jharkhand State. The Population inbabiting in industrialized  region  have  least  calorific intake (Santhal-  1967.


25 K.Cal: Ho- 2003.20 K.Cal. and Bhumij-1942. 11   K.Cal) than the population of dense forested  region (2553.


30   K.Cal.  Ho-2426.86   K.Cal.  and  Bhumij   2008.18  K.Cal.}.   No  doubt,  industrialization  provides    better opportunities to earn money but its major portion is wasted  on the elevation  of so called standard of living and the Theka  (Wine shop)  besides,  immigration  among  tribal  also  resulted   in  changed  nutritional  as  well  as calorific intake.  The  diet of these  tribal populations is inadequate as  per Indian standards.  The deficiency  in diet  is  both  qualitative  and  quantitative,  as  a  result  population suffers  from  a large  number  of  nutritional disorders  like anemia, night blindness, bigot spot etc. on the basis of the study it is suggested that a short term training programme should be launched at Panchayat level  to provide  knowledge of balanced  diet or essential nutrients  of the food as per requirements of Men, Women and children.

Keywords

Tribal population Nutritional status Environmental condition Jharkhand

Article Details

How to Cite
Pandey, B. N., Das, P. L., Ijha, A. K., & Jhas, A. K. (2001). Nutritional Status of Three Tribal Populations of Jharkhand State in Relation to Environmental Conditions. Environment Conservation Journal, 2(2&3), 95–99. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2001.022305

References

  1. Basu A., Jindal A., Kshatrya G., Singh P., Roy P. and Shanna K. K. N. 1989. Genetic and Socio-cultural Determinants of Tribal Health: Bastar Tribal Groups ofMadya Pradesh (Research Report). NIHFW, New Delhi.
  2. Friis Robert, Yngve Agneta and Presson Viveka 1998. Review of social epidemiological research on migrants' health: findings, methodological cautions and theoretical perspective.Scand. J.Soc. Med. 26 (3), 115-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14034949850153464
  3. Gopalan C., Ramasastri B. V. and Subramanian S. C. 1981 . Nutritive Values ofIndian Foods. National Institute ofNutrition. ICMR, Hyderabad.
  4. Gupta S. P. 1974. Tribes of Chotanagpur Plateau. An Ethano-Nutritional and Pharmacological Cross Section. Bihar. Tribal Welfare Research Institute, Ranchi.
  5. Hanna J. H. and Fitzgerald M. H. 1993. Acculturation and symptoms: A comparative study of reported health symptoms in three Samoan Communities.Soc. Sei. Med. 36, 1169-1180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(93)90237-X
  6. Jain S. K. and De J. N. 1964. Some less known foods among the tribal ofpurebia (West Bengal). Science and Culture. 30, 285- 2865.
  7. Pandey B. N. and Shanna P. D. 1998. Report on the Project -Biological Status oftribal groups ofBihar. ICMR, New Delhi.
  8. Pandey B. N. 1999. Report On The Project -Pattern of Human Settlement in and Around the North Gangetic Belt of Bihar with Particular References to Certain Scheduled Tribes. Ministry of Env. And Forests, Government oflndia, New Delhi.
  9. Rao H. D., Mathur Y. N. Radhaiah G. and Rao, P. N. 1986. Health and Nutritional status of Tribal in Madhya Pradesh (Research Project) NIN, Hyderabad.
  10. Sharma K. K. N. 1992. Assessment of Nutritional Status of the Khairwar Tribal Children of M.P. J. Hum. Ecol. 3, 47-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.1992.11907894
  11. Wasir H. S. 1995. Life Style and Longevity. Research and Development. Helpage, India.