Main Article Content

Abstract

The use  of macrophytes plants  for treatment of wastewater for nutrient removable is addressed A stuoy was conducted to ascertain  the  nutrient   reduction   potential   in  freshwater  aquaculture using  Lemna  gibba (Duckweed)   Experiments were conducted with  plastic  trays  of  dimensions 34     27  y  6 cm Wastewater from  freshwater  aquaculture was  collected and experimented under  different dilutions.  Nutrient removal and  productivity of  the  Lemna  gibba system were  studied  for  a period of ten days. the experiments were  conducted over  a period  of SO days The nutrient removal patterns were obtained for  ammonia-nitrogen,  nitrite,  nitrate and  phosphate Reductions in nutrient  in the  Lemna  gibba system are  higher  in  raw wastewater  compared to  dilutions.  Ammonia  nitrogen  had  maximum  removal  efficiency followed  by  nitrate,  nitrite and phosphate.  Biomass  productivity was  also higher  in the raw  wastewater series  than  with dilutions.  The studies indicated the survival  of Lemna gibba in low nutrient  loading  conditions and also as a potential biomass resource


 

Keywords

Duckweed Lema gibba Freshwater aquaculture Nutrient reduction ammonia-N nitrate nitrite phosphate Productivity

Article Details

How to Cite
Karthik, M., & Nagendran, R. (2002). Nutrient Reduction and Productivity Studies in Low Strength Freshwater Aquaculture Wastewater Using Lemna Gibba (Duckweed) System. Environment Conservation Journal, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2002.030101

References

  1. Alabaster J. S. 1982. Report of the EIRAC workshop on fish farm effluents FAO. EIFAC Tech, paper no. 41,pp 165.
  2. APHA-AWWA-WPCF 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 18" edition.Amer. Pub. HIth. Assoc. Washington, D.C.
  3. Boniardi N., Vatta G., Rota R., G and Carra S. 1994 Removal of water pollutants by Lemna gibba. Chem.Engg. J. 54 B, 41-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-0467(94)06051-7
  4. Boyd C. E. 1990. Water Quality in Pondsfor Aquaculture, Birmingham Publ. UK. pp 482.
  5. Dahab M. F. and Lee P. Y. 1993. Nitrate reduction by (in situ) bionitrification in groundwater. Wat. Sci. Tech. 2709), 1493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1992.0593
  6. Harris J 1 98L . Federal regulation of fish hatchery effluent quality. Amer. Fish Soc.. Bioengg. Symposium Fish culture, pp 157-161.
  7. Karpiscak M. M., Gerba Charles, Watt P. J, Pamela M.. Kenneth E. Foster and Falabi, Jeanned, A. 1996. Multi species plant systems for wastewater quality improvements and habitat enhancement. Wat. Sci. Tech. 33(1d0-11), pp 231-236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1996.0679
  8. Martin J. F.. Caudron G. Jan E. and Kofman E. 1978. Tech. Eav. Assain 376.23-25,37721-37,378.79,19-25. Oron. G.. Porath, D. and WildSchut Louw, R. 1986. Wastewater treatment and renovation by different ducweed species. J. of Environ. Engg. 112, 247-263
  9. Picot. B. EI Halouani H., Casellas C., Moersidik S and Bontoux, J 1991. Nutrient removal by high rate pond system is a Mediterranean climate (France). Wat. Sci. Tech. 23, 1535-1541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1991.0607
  10. Reddy K. R. and Debusk W. F. 1987. Nutrient storage capabilities of aquatic and wetland plants. In: K. R. Reddy and W. H Smith (eds) Aquatic Plants for Wastewater Treatment and Resournce Recovery. Magnolia Publications Orlando. pp 337-359
  11. Rejmankva E. 1982. Proceedings First International Wetlands Conference (New Delhi). Pp 397-407.
  12. Sarkar. SK. i997. Seasonal influence of the plant Lemna major in the treatment of eutrophicated ponds. Poll Res. 6 (4), 247-249.