Article Sidebar

Submitted
February 2, 2008
Published
June 16, 2008
Download
13-18
Statistic
Read Counter : 54 Download : 66

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

An  anatomical  study   of  tomato  plants infected by  tomato leaf curl  virus was  conducted   to  elucidate   the mode of infection of  the  causal  virus.  One  to  two  months  after whitefly  transmission,  the  severe   symptoms appear with  thickening of the  veins,  curling  of  leaf  and  stunting of  plant.  Typically   reorganization  of  leaf tissue  consisted   in  replacement of the  spongy  parenchyma   by  a palisade  parenchyma. Palisade   parenchyma tissues   were  compact   in  comparison  to  healthy. Abnormal  cambial  activity  was  observed   in  conducting tissue.  Weaker  selerenchyma  rings   were   narrow  and   these   were   fewer   narrow  xylem  vessels.  Phloem necrosis   was  observed  frequently  in  virus   infected  stem.  Bronzing  &  discoloration  sieve  elements  in phloem  were  also  found  in  infected stem.  The  cortical  parenchyma   was  wider  and  formation of  mechanical and  conducting tissues   was  reduced. In  root   of  infected   plant  secondary   thickening  was  less  in  comparison to  healthy.  Xylem  vessels  were  narrow and  with  scanty  phloem  in diseased  root. The  no. of  stomata was  also reduced   in  infected leaves.

Keywords

Anatomical changes Tomato TLCV Stomatal index

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2008 Environment Conservation Journal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Srivastava, S., Srivastava, G. P., & Tewari, J. P. (2008). The Anatomic responses of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. due to the Tomato Leaf Curl Virus (TLCV). Environment Conservation Journal, 9(1&2), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2008.091203
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Bigare, L., Chazly, M., Salah, M., Ibrahim, M., Padidam, M., Nicole M., Peterschmitt., Fauquet, C. and Thouvenel, J.C., 200 I. Characterization ofa new Begmovirus from Egypt infecting hollyhock (Athearosea). European J. Plant Pathology, 107: 70-71.
  2. Carrol, T. W. and Kosuge T., I 969. Changes in structure of chloroplast accompanying necrosis oftobacco leaves systemically infected with tobacco mosaic virus. Pltytopatlt, 59: 953-962.
  3. Chakraborty, S., Pandey, P.K., Banerjee, M.K., Kaloo, G and FauquetC.M., 2003. Tomato leafcurl Gujarat virus, a new Begmovirus species causing a severe leaf curl disease of tomato in Varanasi, India. Phytopath, 93(12): 1485-1495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.12.1485
  4. Cozosnek, H., Ber, R., Antignus, Y., Cohen, S., Navot, N. and Zamiri, D., 1988. Isolation oftomato leafcurl from India. Plant Dis., 77: 168.
  5. Dubey, G.S. and Bhradwaj S.V., 1982. Histopathological studies in tomato infected with tobacco mosaic virus. Indian Phytopath, 35: 175-177.
  6. Garg, R.C., Chowela, S.C. and Tyagi S.N.S., 1977. Histopathological changes induced by green vein banding virus in Solanum khasiarum Clarke. Indian J. Plant Pathology, 5(2): 129-132.
  7. Johensen, D.A., I940. Plant Microtechnique. Mcgraw Hill Book Co.
  8. Saikia, A.K. and Muniyappa, V., I986. Epidemiology and control of tomato leaf curl virus. Abstract Natt.
  9. Seminar on whitefly transmittedplant virus diseases. IARI, New Delhi, 1986,30.
  10. Saikia, A.K. and Muniyappa V., 1986. Epidemiology and control oftomato leaf curl virus in South India.Trop.Agric. (Trinidad), 66(4): 350-354.
  11. Salisburg, E.J., 1928. 0n the causes and ecological significance ofstomatal frequency with special reference to wood land flora. Phil. Trans. Res. Soc.,216: 1-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1928.0001
  12. Sastry, K.S.M. and Singh, S.J., I 973. Assessment of losses in tomato caused by tomato leaf curl virus. Indian J. Mycol. Plant Pathol., 3: 50-54.
  13. Sharma, I. and Dubey, GS., I 985. Anatomy ofurdbean leafcrinkle virus infected urdbean root. Indian J. Plant Pathology, 3(2): 236-237.
  14. Singh,A., 1970. Studies on mosaic rosette of groundnutArachis hypogea L. Ph.D. Thesis Agra University, Agra, India.
  15. Smith, F.H. and Mc Whorter F.P, 1957. Anatomical effects oftomato ring spot virus in Viciafaba. Am J. Bot., 44: 470-477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1957.tb10566.x
  16. Vasudeva, R.S., Samraj, J., 1948. A leafcurl disease oftomato. Phytopath, 38: 364-369.
  17. Yassin, A.M. and Nour M.A., 1965. Tomato leaf curl disease in Sudan and their relation to tobacco leaf curl. Ann. App. Bio., 5: 207-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1965.tb01228.x