Article Sidebar

Submitted
February 2, 2010
Published
June 18, 2010
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 48 Download : 51

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Rhizoctonia bataticola is a facultative parasite, which causes damping of seedlings and root rot in vegetables, cereals, fruits, oilseed crops and ornamental plants. The present paper deals with the in vitro studies of the production of phenolics by this parasitic fungus.

Keywords

Facultative parasite Fungi Host-parasite relationship Plant pathology

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2010 Environment Conservation Journal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Sapru, T., & Mahajan, S. (2010). Production of phenolics by Rhizoctonia bataticola (taub.) Butler during pathogenesis. Environment Conservation Journal, 11(1&2), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2010.1206
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Arora,Y.K. and Bajaj,K.L., 1978. Phenolic changes in mung (Phaseolus aureus) infected Rhizoctonia solani, Acta. Phytopath. Hung., 13:337-341.
  2. Arnow, L. E., 1937. Colorimetric determination of the components of 2,4- dihydroxy Phenyl alanine tyrosine mixtures, J.Bio.Chem., 118:531-537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)74509-2
  3. Babajan, A. A., Avetisjan, A.D. and Suzian,V.S., 1955. Some physiological and biochemical properties of the cottonplant in connection with its resistance, Izvest. AKAD. NAUK. Armyan USSR., 5:63-71.
  4. Bray, L.C. and Thorpe,W. W., 1954. Analysis of phenolic compounds of interest in metabolism, Meth. Biochem. Anal., 1:27-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470110171.ch2
  5. Cruickshank,I.A.M. and Perrin, D. R., 1964. Pathological function of phenolic compounds in plants. In: Biochemistry of phenolic compounds (Harborne, J.B. Ed.), pp. 511-544., Academic Press, INC. New York, London, pp.618.
  6. Das, V. S. R. and Rao, J. V. S.,1964. Phenolic acids of onion plant (Allium cepa), Curr. Sci., 33:471-472.
  7. Farkas, G. L. and Ledingham, G.A.,1959. Studies on the polyphenoloxidase system of wheat stem rust uredospores, Canad.J. Microbiol., 5:37-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/m59-005
  8. Farkas, G. L. and Kiraly,Z., 1962. Role of phenolic compounds in the physiology of plant disease resistance, Phytopath. Z., 44:105-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.1962.tb02005.x
  9. Fuchs,W.H. and Eva Kotte, 1954. Zur kenntris der Resistenz von Solanum tuberosum gegen Phytophthora infestens de by Naturewissenschaften, 41:169-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00639254
  10. Harborne, J.B., 1973. Phytochemical methods, Chapman and Hall Ltd., London, pp. 278.
  11. Jalali, B.L., Singh,G. and Grower,R.K. 1976. Role of phenolics in bacterial blight resistance in cotton, Acta Phytopath., 11:81-83.
  12. Kiraly,Z. and Farkas,G.L.,1962. Relation between phenol metabolism and stem rust of wheat, Phytopathology, 52:657-664.
  13. Kuc, J., 1966. Resistance of plants to infectious agents, Ann.Rev. Microbiol. , 20:337-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.20.100166.002005
  14. Mall, S. and Suresh, K., 1989. Phenolic compounds associated with Rhizoctonia solani Pathogenic to potato, IndianPhytopath., 42:183-184.
  15. Manaskaya, S.M., 1948. Participation of oxidases in lignin formation., Compt. Rend. Acad.Sci., USSR., 62:369-402.
  16. Oku, H., 1960. Biochemical studies on Cochliobolus miyabeanus, VII. Properties of polyphenoloxidase produced by the fungus, Ann.Rept. Takamine Lab. 12: 261-265.
  17. Pierre,R. E. and Bateman,D.F., 1967. Induction and distribution of phytoalexine in Rhizoctonia infected bean hypocotyle, Phytopathology, 57:1154-1160.
  18. Pierson, C. F., Gothoskar, S. S., Walker, J.C. and Stahmann, M.A., 1955. Histological studies on the role of pectic enzymes in the development of Fusarium wilt symptoms in tomato, Phytopathology, 45:524-526.
  19. Reddy, M.N. and Rao, A.S. 1975. Phenolics associated with Rhizoctonia solani in culture and in groundnut during pathogenesis, Phytopath.Z., 83:103-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.1975.tb03520.x
  20. Reddy, M. N. and Rao, A. S., 1979. The role phenolic substances in damping off of groundnut caused by Rhizoctonia solani, In Current trends in Life Science Vol..6. (Mahadevan,A., Eds.), pp.105-113., Today and Tomorrow’s Publishers, New Delhi, pp.495.
  21. Romanowski, R. D., Kue, J. and Quuackenbush, F.W., 1962. Biochemical changes in seedling of bean infected with Colletotrichum lind emuthianum, Phyto pathology, 52:1259-1263.
  22. Rubin, B. A. and Ivanova,T. M., 1960. Changes in phenolic compounds in Cabbage tissue infected with Botrytis cinerea, Doklady. Akad. Nauk. USSR., 131: 445-448.
  23. Singh, P. J., Nagra, P. and Mehrotra, R.S., 1982. Relation between phenol and Rhizoctonia bataticola infection in gram, Indian J. Mycol. Pl. Pathol., 12:46-48.
  24. Suresh, K., 1982. Pathogenicity and physiology of stem canker and dry rot of potato, Ph.D.Thesis submitted to Vikram University, Ujjain.
  25. Swain, T. and Hillis, W.E., 1959. The phenolic constituents of Prunus domestica,J.Soci.Food Agri., 10:63-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740100110