Main Article Content

Abstract

Rivers are highly vulnerable to anthropogenic changes. The hill streams so far considered pristine are now being subjected to increased anthropogenic influences. The present study was undertaken to identify and assess the anthropogenic activities in the riparian zone of River Manuni, in Beas watershed. During the course of investigation anthropogenic activities like slate mining, river bed mining, water withdrawal for drinking and agriculture purpose, initiation of micro hydroelectric projects and number of miscellaneous activities have been observed in River Manuni during March 2009- February 2011.

Keywords

River Manuni anthropogenic activities riparian zone benthic macroinvertebrates

Article Details

How to Cite
Sharma, N. K., Gusain, M. P., & Gusain, O. P. (2012). A report on anthropogenic activities in the riparian zone of River Manuni, Himachal Pradesh. Environment Conservation Journal, 13(1&2), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.36953/ECJ.2012.131206

References

  1. Allan, J. D. and Castillo, M. M. 2007.Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running waters.Springer.XIV+436.
  2. Angermeier, P. L. and Winston, M. R. 1999. Characterizing fish community diversity across Virginia landscapes: prerequisite for conservation. Ecological Applications 9: 335–349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0335:CFCDAV]2.0.CO;2
  3. APHA, AWWA and WEF, 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (21th Ed.). Washington: American Public Health Association.
  4. Aura, C. M., Raburu, P. O. and Herrmann, J. 2011.Macroinvertebrates community structure in Rivers Kipkaren and Sosiani, River Nzoia basin, Kenya.Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment 3(2): 39-46.
  5. Bredenhand, E. and Samways, M. J. 2009. Impact of a dam on benthic macroinvertebrates in a small river in a biodiversity hotspot: Cape Floristic Region, South Africa.Journal of Insect Conservation 13: 297–307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-008-9173-2
  6. Burks, B. D. 1953. The Mayflies, or Ephemeroptera, of Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 26 (1): 215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21900/j.inhs.v26.176
  7. Chitale, M. A. 1992. Development of India’s river basins.Water Resources Development 8: 30-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07900629208722531
  8. Corkum, L. D. 1999. Conservation of running waters: beyond riparian vegetation and species richness. Aquatic Conservation.Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 9: 559-564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0755(199911/12)9:6<559::AID-AQC384>3.0.CO;2-#
  9. Dudgeon, D. 1999.Tropical Asian Streams: Zoobenthos, Ecology and Conservation. Hong Kong University Press. 830.
  10. Dudgeon, D., Arthington, A. H., Gessner, M. O., Kawabata, Z., Knowler, D. J., Leveque, C., Naiman, R. J., Richard, A. H. P., Soto, D., Stiassny, M. L.J., Sullivan, C.A. 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biological Reviews 81: 163-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793105006950
  11. Edington, J. M. and Hildrew, A. G.1981. A Key to the Caseless Caddis Larvae of the British Isles: with notes on their ecology.Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication No.53. 91.
  12. Elliott, J. M., Humpesch, U. H. and Macan, T. T. 1988.Larvae of the British Ephemeroptera: A key with ecological notes.Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication No. 49. 145.
  13. Golterman, H. L. Clymo, R.S. and Ohnstad, M. A. M. 1978.Methods for Physical and Chemical Analysis of Freshwaters. Blackwell Scientific Publcations Oxford. IBP Handbook 8.XVI + 213.
  14. Heino, J., Parviainen, J., Paavola, R., Jehle, M., Louhi, P.&Muotka, T. 2005. Characterizing macroinvertebrate assemblage structure in relation to stream size and tributary position.Hydrobiologia 539: 121–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-004-3914-3
  15. Hynes, H. B. N. 1977. A Key to the Adults and Nymphs of the British Stoneflies: with notes on their ecology and distribution. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication No.17. 90.
  16. Hynes, H. B. N. 1989. Keynote address.Canadian special publications of fisheries and Aquatic Science 106: 5-10.
  17. (ICMR) Indian Council of Medical Research, 1963. Manual and Methods for the Examination of Water, Sewage and Industrial Wastes, New Delhi.47: v+180.
  18. Jessup, B. K., Markowitz, A., Stribling, J. B., Friedman, E., LaBelle, K. and Dziepak, N., 2003. Family-Level Key to the Stream Invertebrates of Maryland and Surrounding Areas.Maryland Department of Natural Resources-Maryland U.S.
  19. Joshi, B. D. and Shah, K. 2011. River bed mining is highly injurious for fishes and other aquatic organisms: a report based on random field visits. Journal of Environment and Bio-Sciences 25 (2): 295-298.
  20. Karr, J. R., Toth, L. A., Dudley, D. R. 1985. Fish communities of midwestern rivers: a history of degradation. BioScience35: 90–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1309845
  21. Kazanci, N. and Dugel, M. 2008. Predation of global climate change impact on structure of aquatic insect assemblages by using species optimum and tolerance values of temperature. Review of Hydrobiology 2: 73-80.
  22. Litvan, M. E., Stewart, T. W., Pierce, C. L. and Larson, C. J. 2007.Effect of grade control structures on the macroinvertebrate assemblage of an agriculturally impacted stream.River Research and Applications. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1063
  23. Macan, T. T. 1979. A Key to the Nymphs of the British Species of Ephemeroptera: with notes on their ecology. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication No.20. 79.
  24. Moore, A. A. and Palmer, M. A. 2005.Invertebrate biodiversity in agricultural and urban headwater streams: implications for conservation and management. Ecological Applications 15 (4): 1169-1177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1484
  25. Needham, J. G. and Needham, P. R. 1962.A Guide to the Study of Freshwater Biology (5th Ed.).Holden-Day Inc. San Francisco. 108.
  26. Peters, N. E. and Meybeck, M. 2000. Water quality degradation effects on freshwater availability: Impacts of human activities. International Water Resources Association, Water International 25 (2): 185-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060008686817
  27. Ranjit, R. 1995. Present status of water pollution in Nepal. In :Timotius, K. H. and Goltenboth, F. (Eds), Tropical Limnology Vol. III. Tropical Rivers, Wetlands and Special Topics.SatyaWacana University Press, Salatiga, Indonesia.161-167.
  28. Sala, O. E., Chapin, F. S., Armesto, J. J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R., Huber-Sanwald, E., Huenneke, L. F., Jackson, R. B., Kinzig, A., Leemans, R., Lodge, D. M., Mooney, H. A., Oesterheld, M., Poff, N. L., Sykes, M. T., Walker, B. H. ,Walker, M. and Wall, D. H. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100.Science 287: 1770-1774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5459.1770
  29. Schworebel, J. 1970. Methods of Hydrobiology.Pergamon press. 200.
  30. Singh, S. 1993. Environmental degradation due to slate mining: a case study of Khanyara mines, district Kangra, Himachal Pradesh. M. Phil. dissertation, submitted to the Department of Geography, Himachal Pradesh University Summer Hill, Shimla-171005.
  31. Trivedy, R. K. and Goel, P. K. 1984.Chemical and Biological Methods for Water Pollution Studies.Environmental Publications, Karad. 215+XXXII.
  32. Usinger, R. L. 1956. Aquatic Insects of California.University of California Press.508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520320390
  33. Wallace, I. D., Wallace, B. and Philipson, G. N. 1990.A Key to the Case-Bearing Caddis Larvae of Britain and Ireland.Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication No.51. 237.
  34. Welch, P. S. 1952. Limnology (2nd Ed.)McGraw - Hill Book Comp. New York. 538.