Main Article Content


Due to the continuous increase in industrialisation and urbanization, wastewater has been released regularly into the environment in excess amount, causing noteworthy impacts on human and wild life. Management and eco-friendly treatment of the waste water whether industrial and domestic is the challenge of this century. In the present study an attempt has been made to treat the waste water using three aquatic macrophytes viz. water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), canna (Cana indica) and duckweed (Lemna minor) for assessing the potential of these plants in the treatment of sewage collected from drain located nearby Graphic Era University, Dehradun using phytoremediation technology on the basis of different physicochemical parameters such as pH, EC, DO, ORP, Salinity, TDS, BOD, COD, Hardness and Temperature. The study was divided into seven consecutive assessment periods of five days interval each. Highest removal was observed in the experiment containing canna in each parameters which suggest that in the present study canna (C. indica) was found most efficient plant in comparison to E. crassipes and L. minor. The capability of these plants in the treatment of wastewater was established from the study. For efficient water purification, it is recommended to remove the aquatic macrophytes from water bodies. If the harvesting of these aquatic macrophytes will not be performed properly, the vast majority of the nutrients that have been absorbed and stored into the plant tissue will released again into the water bodies due to decomposition of these macrophytes.


Harvesting Eichhornia crassipes IWMI O and M problem sullage

Article Details

How to Cite
Bhutiani, R., Rai , N., Sharma, P., Rausa, . K., & Ahamad, F. (2019). Phytoremediation efficiency of water hyacinth (E. crassipes), canna (C. indica) and duckweed (L. minor) plants in treatment of sewage water. Environment Conservation Journal, 20(1&2), 143–156.


  1. APHA, AWWA WPCF, 2012. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. American Public Health Association, Washington 14th Edition. N. York. 193.
  2. APIRIS, 2005. Invasive Non indigenous Plants in Florida., Online Available:
  3. Bhutiani, R., Khanna, D. R., Shubham and Ahamad, F. 2016. Physico-chemical analysis of Sewage water treatment plant at Jagjeetpur, Haridwar, Uttarakhand. Environ. Cons. Jour., 17(3): 133-142.
  4. Bhutiani, R. and Ahamad, F. 2018. Efficiency assessment of Sand Intermittent Filtration Technology for waste water Treatment. International Journal of advance research in science and engineering (IJARSE), 7(03): 503-512.
  5. Borges, A. K. P., Tauk-Tornisielo, S. M., Domingos, R. N. and Angelis, D. F. 2008. Performance of the constructed wetland system for the treatment of water from the Corumbatai river., Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol., 51(6): 1279-1286.
  6. Cunningham, S. D., William, R. B. and Jianwei, W. H. 1995. Phytoremediation of contaminated soils, Tibtech, 13: 393-397.
  7. Dar, S. H., Kumawat, D. M., Singh, N. and Wani, K. A. 2011. Sewage treatment potential of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). Res. J. Environ. Sci., 5(4): 377-385.
  8. Deshmukh , A. A., Bandela, N. N., Chavan, J. R. and Nalawade, P. M. 2013. Studies on Potential Use of Water Hyacinth, Pistia and Azolla for Municipal Waste Water Treatment. Environment, 3(11): 226-228.
  9. Dhote, S. and Dixit, S. 2007. Water quality improvement through macrophytes: A case study., Asian J. Exp. Sci., 21(2): 427-430.
  10. Dhote, S. and Dixit, S. 2009. Water quality improvement through macrophytes- A review. Environ. Monit. Assess., 152: 149-153.
  11. ENVIS Centre on Hygiene, Sanitation, Sewage Treatment Systems and Technology, STST_wastewater_2090.aspx
  12. Fonseka, S. and Amarasinghe, D. 2016. Characterization of ground water hardness with special reference to Polpithigama Divisional Secretariat Area in Kurunegala district and potential use of plants to reduce water Hardness. Thesis submitted to department of Botany and the department of Chemistry, University of Kelaniya.
  13. Greongerg, A. E., Connors, J. E., Jinkins, D. and Fransons, M. A. 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water (15th ed., pp. 199–209). Washington DC: American Public Health Association, APHA.
  14. IWMI, 2003-2004. International Water Management Institute annual report.
  15. Jamuna, S. and Noorjahan, C. M. 2009. Treatment of sewage waste water using water hyacinth - Eichhornia sp and its reuse for fish culture. Toxicol. Int., 16(2): 103-106.
  16. John, R., Ahmad, P., Gadgil, K. and Sharma, S. 2008. Effect of cadmium and lead on growth, biochemical parameters and uptake in Lemna polyrrhiza L. Plant Soil Environ., 54: 262-270.
  17. Khanna, D. R. and Bhutiani, R. 2008. Laboratory manual of water and Waste water Analysis. Daya Publishing House New Delhi -110002.
  18. Kumar, V., Chopra, A. K. 2016. Reduction of pollution load of paper mill effluent by phytoremediation technique using water caltrop (Trapa natans L.). Cogent Environmental Science, 2: 1153216.
  19. Kumar, V., Chopra, A. K., Singh, J., Thakur, R. K., Srivastava, S., and Chauhan, R. K. 2016. Comparative assessment of phytoremediation feasibility of water caltrop (Trapa natans L.) and water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes Solms.) using pulp and paper mill effluent. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 1(1): 13-21.
  20. Kumar, V., Chopra, A. K., Singh, J., Thakur, R. K., Srivastava, S. and Chauhan, R. K. 2017b. Comparative assessment of phytoremediation feasibility of water caltrop (Trapa natans L.) and water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes Solms.) using pulp and paper mill effluent. Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science, 1(1): 13-21.
  21. Kumar, V., Singh, J. and Chopra, A. K. 2017a. Assessment of phytokinetic removal of pollutants of paper mill effluent using water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes [Mart.] Solms), Environmental Technology, 10. 1080/ 09593330.2017.1365944
  22. Landolt, E., (Ed.), 1980. Biosystematic investigations in the family of duckweeds(Lamnaceae), Veroffentlichungen des Geobotanischem institutes der ETH 1. Geobotanischen institutes, Stiftung Rubel, Zurich, 247.
  23. Landolt, E., (Ed.), 1986. The family of Lamnaceae: A monographic Study (Vol. 1), Biosystematic investigation in the family of Duckweeds, Veroffentlichungen des Geobotanischen Institutes der ETH1, Geobotanyschen Institutes, Stiftung Rubel, Zurich, 566.
  24. Landolt, E., 1982. Distribution pattern within the family Lamnaceae. In: Symoens, J.J., Hooper, S.S., Compere, P.,(EdS.) Studies on aquatic vascular plants, Royal Botanic Society of Belgium, Brussels, 313-321.
  25. Les, D. H., Landolt, E., Gabel, J. D. and Kemball, R. T. 2002. Phylogeny and systematics of Lamnaceae, the duckweed family. Systematic Botany, 27: 221-240.
  26. Mahmood, Q., Zheng, P., Islam, E., Hayat, Y., Hassan, M. J., Jilani, G. and Jin, R.C. 2005. Lab scale studies on water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes marts solms) for biotreatment of textile wastewater. Caspian Journal of Environmental 3(2): 83-88.
  27. Maine, M. A., Sune, N. L. and Lagger, S. C. 2004. Chromium bioaccumulation: Comparison of the capacity of two floating aquatic macrophytes. Water Res., 38: 1494-1501.
  28. Mangas-Ramirez, E. and Elias-Gutierrez, M. 2004. Effect of mechanical removal of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) on the water quality and biological communities in a Mexican reservoir., J. Aquat. Ecosys. Health Manage., 7: 161-168.
  29. Mishra, V. K., Upadhyay, A. R., Pandey, S. K. and Tripathi, B.D. 2008. Concentrations of heavy metals and aquatic macrophytes of Govind Ballabh Pant Sagar an anthropogenic lake affected by coal mining effluent. Environ. Monit. Assess., 141: 49-58.
  30. Mkandawire, M. and Dudel, E. G., 2005b. Assignment of Lemna gibba L., (duck-weed) bioassay for in situ ecotoxicity assessment. Aquatic Ecology, 39: 151-165.
  31. Mkandawire, M. and Dudel, E. G. 2005a. Accumulation of arsenic in Lemna gibba L. (duckweed) in tailing waters of two abandoned uranium mines in Saxony, Germany, Science of the Total Environment, 336: 81-89.
  32. Nieder, W.C., Barnaba, E., Findlay, S. E. G., Hoskins, S., Holochuck, N. and Blair. E. A. 2004. Distribution and abundance of submerged aquatic vegetation and Trapa natans in the Hudson River Estuary. J. C. Res., 45: 150-161.
  33. Oron, G., De Vegt, A. and Porath, D. 1988. Nitrogen removal and conversion by duckweed grown on wastewater. Water Res., 22: 179–84.
  34. Padmapriya, G., and Murugesan, A. G. 2012. Phytoremediation of various heavy metals (Cu, Pb and Hg) from aqueous solution using water hyacinth and its toxicity on plants. International Journal of Environmental Biology, 2(3): 97-103.
  35. Patil, J. H., Raj, M. L. A, Bhargav S. and Sowmya S. R. 2011. Anaerobic co-digestion of water hyacinth with primary sludge. Res. J. Chem. Sci., 1 (3): 72-77.
  36. Perna, C. and Burrows, D., 2005. Improved dissolved oxygen status following removal of exotic weed mats in important fish habitat lagoons of the tropical Burdek in river floodplain, Australia., Marine Poll. Bull., 51: 138-148.
  37. Reddy, K. R. 1983. Fate of nitrogen and phosphorus in wastewater retention reservoir containing aquatic macrophytes. J. Environ. Qual., 12:137- 141.
  38. Reddy, K. R. and Sutton, D. L. 1984. Water hyacinths for water quality improvement and biomass production. J. Environ. Qual., 13(1): 1-9.
  39. Roongtanakiat, N., Tangruangkiat, S. and Meesat, R. 2007. Utilization of vetiver grass (Vetiveria zizanioides) for removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewaters. Science Asia, 33: 397-403.
  40. Schulz, M., Rinle, K., and Kohler, J. 2003. A combined approach of photogrammetrical methods and field studies to determine nutrient retention by submersed macrophytes in running waters. Aquat. Bot., 76(1): 17-29.
  41. Selvarathi, P. and Ramasubramanian, V. J. 2010. Phytoremedial effect of Datura metel L. on paper mill effluent and its impact on Physicochemical characteristics of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Bioscience Research, 1(2): 94–100.
  42. Shah, R.A., Kumawat, D. M., Singh, N. and Wani, K. A. 2010. Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) as a remediation tool for dye-effluent pollution., Int. J. Sci. Nature, 1(2): 172-178.
  43. Singh, O. V., Labana, S., Pandey, G., Budhiraja, R., Jain, R. K. 2003. Phytoremediation: An overview of metallic ion decontamination from soil. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 61: 405-412.
  44. Sooknah, R. D., and Wilkie, A. C. 2004. Nutrient removal by floating aquatic macrophytes cultured in anaerobically digested flushed dairy manure wastewater. Ecological Engineering, (22): 27- 42.
  45. Stefani, G. D., Tocchetto, D., Salvato, M. and Borin, M. 2011. Performance of a floating treatment wetland for in-stream water amelioration in NE Italy. Hydrobiologia, 674: 157-167.
  46. Trivedi, R. K. and Goel, P. K. 1986. Chemical and biological methods for water pollution studies. Environmental publications; 1-250.
  47. USEPA, 1988. Design Manual - Constructed wetlands and aquatic systems for municipal wastewater treatment, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Report no. EPA/625/1-88/022, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH, 83.
  48. Villamagna, A. M. 2009. Ecological effects of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) on lake Chapala, Mexico, Ph.D Thesis, Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia.
  49. Wolverton, B. C. and McDonald, R. C. 1979. The water hyacinth: from prolific pest to potential provider. Ambio, 8: 1-12.
  50. Xia, H. and Ma, X. 2006. Phytoremediation of ethion by water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) from water. Bioresource Technol., 97: 1050-1054.